The Pros and Cons of Buying Off-the-Plan as an Investor
By
Trent Bradley
·
10 minute read

Buying off-the-plan – purchasing property before construction completes, often from architectural plans and artist's impressions – represents a distinctly different investment approach than acquiring existing properties. Developers market off-the-plan sales aggressively to property investors, highlighting benefits like lower initial deposits, potential capital gains during construction, and modern specifications. But is off-the-plan investment as attractive as marketing materials suggest?
At Luminate Financial Group, we regularly advise investors considering off-the-plan purchases. We've seen spectacular successes where properties appreciated significantly during construction, delivering instant equity at completion. We've also witnessed disappointing outcomes where properties completed worth less than purchase prices, creating negative equity situations and financial stress for investors who bought at market peaks.
Off-the-plan investment involves unique risks and benefits absent from existing property purchases. Understanding these thoroughly enables informed decisions about whether off-the-plan suits your investment strategy and circumstances.
Let's explore off-the-plan investment comprehensively, examining both the compelling advantages and the significant risks that marketing materials often downplay or ignore entirely.
Understanding Off-the-Plan Purchases
Off-the-plan purchasing means contracting to buy property before construction completes, sometimes before construction even begins. You commit to purchase based on plans, specifications, and promises rather than completed buildings you can inspect physically.
The Off-the-Plan Process
Initial Marketing Phase: Developers market projects through real estate agents, showcasing artist's renderings, floor plans, location maps, and amenity descriptions. Initial buyers often receive early-bird pricing or incentives.
Sale and Purchase Agreement: You sign contracts committing to purchase at agreed prices, typically paying a 10% deposit immediately with the balance due at completion. The agreement specifies completion timeframes (usually ranges rather than fixed dates) and detailed specifications.
Construction Period: Construction occurs over 12-24 months typically, sometimes longer for large projects. You have no access to the property during this period and often limited visibility into construction progress.
Practical Completion: Once construction reaches "practical completion" (substantially finished with minor defects acceptable), you must settle – paying the remaining purchase price and taking ownership, whether or not you're satisfied with the result or whether market conditions have changed favorably or unfavorably.
Common Off-the-Plan Property Types
Most New Zealand off-the-plan sales involve apartments in multi-level developments, townhouses in medium-density subdivisions, or retirement village units for specific demographics. Standalone houses occasionally sell off-the-plan but less commonly than multi-unit developments.
The Advantages of Off-the-Plan Investment
Developers and their agents emphasize numerous benefits of off-the-plan purchases. Many of these advantages are genuine, though the extent varies significantly based on specific circumstances.
Lower Initial Deposit Requirements
Off-the-plan purchases typically require only 10% deposits initially, with the remaining 90% due at completion potentially 12-24 months later. This compares favorably to existing properties requiring full deposits immediately.
This structure enables securing properties with less capital upfront, potentially allowing you to contract for multiple properties simultaneously with limited capital, or freeing capital for other investments during the construction period.
Example: Contracting for a $650,000 off-the-plan apartment requires $65,000 initially versus approximately $260,000 (40% deposit) for an existing investment property. You can control the same value property with one-quarter the immediate capital.
Potential Capital Appreciation During Construction
Properties purchased early in marketing campaigns sometimes appreciate during construction if markets strengthen. If you contract at $650,000 and the property completes 18 months later worth $700,000, you've gained $50,000 equity before even taking ownership.
This appreciation potential represents off-the-plan's most compelling upside – the possibility of instant equity at completion without contributing beyond your initial deposit.
Historical New Zealand Context: During strong market periods like 2015-2016 and 2020-2021, many off-the-plan buyers experienced this favorable outcome. Properties contracted during market lulls appreciated substantially by completion as markets strengthened, delivering instant equity.
Modern Specifications and Warranties
New properties include contemporary designs, current building code compliance, efficient insulation and heating, modern appliances and fixtures, and comprehensive warranties covering structural defects and workmanship.
Tenants often pay premiums for new properties over older alternatives, potentially improving rental yields and reducing vacancy periods. Modern efficiency also reduces utility costs, appealing to cost-conscious tenants.
Favorable Tax Treatment
New builds enjoy tax advantages including full interest deductibility on mortgages (where most existing properties face restrictions), five-year bright-line test versus ten years for existing properties, and potential depreciation claims on chattels and certain building components.
These tax benefits improve after-tax returns meaningfully, particularly for highly leveraged investors in higher tax brackets.
Time to Arrange Financing
The extended period between contract and settlement provides time to optimize your financial position, arrange competitive financing, accumulate additional savings, or address any credit issues. You're not rushing to secure finance within standard settlement periods.
This timeframe allows strategic financial preparation for settlement rather than scrambling to meet immediate deadlines.
Ability to Customize
Some developers offer customization options for early buyers including selecting finishes, fixtures, or color schemes, potentially adding minor improvements or upgrades, or occasionally modifying layouts within limits.
This customization creates properties better suited to tenant preferences, potentially improving rental appeal and reducing vacancy.
First Access to New Developments
Early off-the-plan buyers access the best properties in developments – premium floor levels, superior views, optimal orientations, or largest floor plans. Later buyers face limited remaining inventory with less desirable characteristics.
Developer Incentives
Developers sometimes offer incentives to early buyers including below-market pricing, contributions toward purchase costs, upgraded specifications at no additional cost, or rental guarantees for initial periods.
These incentives can provide genuine value, though they should be evaluated carefully rather than accepted as automatically beneficial.
The Disadvantages and Risks of Off-the-Plan Investment
While advantages exist, off-the-plan investment involves significant risks that developers and agents often minimize or fail to disclose adequately.
Market Risk During Construction
Property markets don't move in only one direction. Properties contracted during market peaks may complete when markets have corrected, creating negative equity situations where completion values fall below purchase prices.
Critical Risk: You're legally committed to complete purchases regardless of market movements. If you contract at $650,000 and the property completes worth only $550,000, you still must pay $650,000 or face potentially catastrophic consequences including forfeiting your deposit, liability for developer losses, and legal action for breach of contract.
Historical New Zealand Context: Buyers who purchased Auckland apartments off-the-plan during 2015-2016 market peaks faced this exact scenario. Properties contracted at $550,000-$600,000 completed 18-24 months later worth only $450,000-$500,000 as the market corrected, leaving investors with instant $50,000-$100,000+ negative equity positions.
This risk is substantial and potentially financially devastating.
Construction Delays
Developers regularly miss completion deadlines due to weather, consenting delays, labor shortages, material delays, or financial problems. Construction periods often extend months beyond initial projections.
Delays create multiple problems including rental income commencing later than planned, interest costs continuing without offsetting income, inability to access property when needed for portfolio refinancing, and potential carrying costs on bridging finance if you've purchased new owner-occupied property expecting to settle sale of existing property.
Sale and purchase agreements typically give developers wide latitude on completion timing, often specifying 12-24 month ranges. You have limited recourse for delays within these generous windows.
Quality and Specification Risks
The property you receive may differ from marketing materials and your expectations including inferior quality materials than promised, specifications not matching agreements, poor workmanship in construction, defects requiring remediation, or finishes that looked appealing in showrooms but appear cheap in reality.
While sale agreements specify requirements and you can pursue warranties for defects, the process is often frustrating, time-consuming, and sometimes unsuccessful.
No Physical Inspection Before Commitment
You're committing to significant purchases sight unseen, relying on plans and marketing materials rather than physical inspection. This creates uncertainty about actual quality, size perception (rooms often feel smaller than floor plans suggest), noise transmission between units, actual views versus promised views, and natural light and orientation.
Many buyers experience disappointment at completion when reality doesn't match expectations formed from glossy marketing materials.
Oversupply Risk
Developers often launch multiple projects simultaneously in popular areas. If numerous buildings complete within short periods, oversupply can suppress both values and rents.
Example: Auckland's central city experienced periods where 500+ apartments completed within months, flooding the market. Values stagnated or declined while rental yields compressed as landlords competed for limited tenants.
This oversupply risk is difficult to assess at purchase since you may not know what other developments are planned or underway when you contract.
Valuation Challenges at Settlement
Banks order valuations at settlement to confirm properties are worth at least purchase prices before releasing mortgages. If valuations come in below purchase prices, you face significant problems including banks refusing to lend full amounts, requiring you to fund shortfalls from personal savings, forcing you to renegotiate with developers (rarely successful), or compelling you to walk away, forfeiting deposits and facing legal consequences.
Off-the-plan properties often face conservative valuations since they lack sales comparison data, and valuers may recognize market softening that occurred during construction.
Developer Financial Risk
Developers sometimes experience financial difficulties during construction, potentially resulting in construction stopping mid-project, quality compromises as developers cut costs, developers entering receivership or liquidation, or projects being completed by replacement developers with different standards or timeframes.
While contractual protections exist, developer failure creates uncertainty and potential losses for buyers.
Body Corporate Uncertainty
For apartments and townhouses, body corporate structures don't exist at purchase. You're committing without knowing future body corporate fees, governance quality, reserve fund levels, or long-term maintenance costs.
Body corporate fees often prove higher than developers initially indicate, substantially impacting cash flow projections.
Limited Ability to Exit
Once you've signed unconditional off-the-plan contracts, exiting is extremely difficult and expensive, typically involving selling your contract to replacement buyers (if permitted and buyers can be found), potentially at losses if market sentiment has shifted, convincing developers to release you from contracts (rarely successful), or simply breaching contracts and accepting consequences.
This illiquidity creates vulnerability if your circumstances change during the construction period.
Opportunity Cost
Capital tied up in off-the-plan deposits sits earning no return during construction periods. Meanwhile, other investment opportunities may emerge that you cannot pursue due to committed capital.
If markets strengthen significantly during construction, existing properties you could have purchased immediately would have appreciated throughout the period, potentially outperforming any gains on off-the-plan purchases.
Strategic Considerations for Off-the-Plan Investment
Whether off-the-plan investment suits you depends on numerous factors beyond the property itself.
Market Cycle Positioning
Off-the-plan investment works best when purchasing early in market upswings, creating high probability of appreciation during construction. Purchasing during market peaks or later in cycles creates substantial risk of value declines by completion.
Critical Question: Where are we in the property cycle? If markets have been rising rapidly for 3-4 years, caution is warranted. If markets have recently corrected and early signs of recovery emerge, off-the-plan risk-reward may favor investors.
Market timing is notoriously difficult, but thoughtful consideration of cycle positioning should inform off-the-plan decisions.
Financial Buffer and Flexibility
Only consider off-the-plan investment if you have substantial financial buffers to absorb potential adverse outcomes including valuations below purchase prices requiring additional capital, construction delays extending settlement timeframes, immediate rental challenges requiring longer vacancy absorption, or market corrections creating negative equity positions.
If completing settlements would strain your finances under best-case scenarios, off-the-plan investment is inappropriate regardless of other factors.
Appetite for Risk and Uncertainty
Off-the-plan investment is inherently riskier and more uncertain than existing property investment. You're committing significant capital to properties you cannot inspect, in markets that may move adversely, with completion timing beyond your control.
Conservative investors uncomfortable with this uncertainty should avoid off-the-plan investment regardless of potential upsides. More risk-tolerant investors comfortable with uncertainty may find acceptable risk-reward profiles.
Portfolio Context
Off-the-plan investment might represent acceptable risk as one component of diversified portfolios but inappropriate as a sole or dominant holding.
If you own several existing properties with established equity, adding one off-the-plan purchase as a speculative position represents manageable risk. If off-the-plan would be your only or primary holding, concentration risk is excessive.
Tax Position
High-income investors in top tax brackets benefit most from new build tax advantages, potentially justifying accepting additional off-the-plan risks for superior after-tax returns.
Lower-income investors gaining minimal tax benefits should question whether tax advantages justify off-the-plan risks versus existing property investment.
Investment Timeline
Long-term investors (15+ years) can potentially absorb short-term value fluctuations at completion, holding through market cycles until values recover and exceed purchase prices. Short to medium-term investors face greater risk from adverse value movements at completion.
Mitigating Off-the-Plan Risks
While off-the-plan investment inherently involves risks, several strategies reduce exposure.
Thorough Developer Due Diligence
Research developers extensively before committing including reviewing track records and previous projects, investigating financial stability, reading online reviews from previous buyers, inspecting completed developments by the same developer, and verifying claims about specifications, quality, and finishes.
Established developers with strong track records present lower risk than new developers with limited history.
Conservative Purchase Pricing
Only purchase off-the-plan if pricing appears conservative relative to current market values. Seek opportunities priced 10-15% below current comparable sales to provide buffer against potential market softening.
Paying premium prices for off-the-plan properties eliminates margin for error and maximizes risk.
Realistic Market Assessment
Independently assess market conditions and cycles rather than relying on developer marketing. Consult independent real estate analysts, review market data, and form objective views about likely market trajectories during construction periods.
If objective analysis suggests markets are at or near peaks, avoid off-the-plan regardless of developer assurances about continued appreciation.
Building and Pest Inspection Clauses
Where possible, include clauses allowing independent building inspections at practical completion before unconditional settlement. This provides opportunity to identify significant defects and potentially refuse settlement or negotiate remediation.
Standard sale agreements often limit this right, but some developers accept such clauses, particularly for early buyers or competitive situations.
Sunset Clauses
Ensure contracts include reasonable sunset clauses allowing cancellation if completion doesn't occur within specified extended timeframes. This protects against indefinite construction delays.
Understand the sunset date and your rights if construction extends beyond this timeline.
Financial Stress Testing
Model settlement scenarios assuming property values 10-20% below purchase prices, requiring you to fund valuation shortfalls. Ensure you have capacity to complete settlements under these adverse scenarios without devastating financial consequences.
If adverse scenarios would create unsustainable financial stress, don't proceed regardless of optimistic expectations.
Limited Exposure
Limit off-the-plan exposure to modest percentages of overall portfolios or net worth. Never commit majority capital to off-the-plan properties given the concentrated risk.
Consider maximum exposure rules like limiting off-the-plan to 20-30% of property portfolio value or net worth.
Alternatives to Off-the-Plan Investment
Before committing to off-the-plan purchases, consider whether alternatives might serve your goals with lower risk.
Existing New Builds
Recently completed properties (under 12 months old) offer most new build benefits including modern specifications, warranties, favorable tax treatment, and new condition without off-the-plan risks like market movements during construction, uncertainty about quality and specifications, or construction delays.
These properties often represent better risk-reward than off-the-plan purchases.
Established Properties in Strong Markets
Quality existing properties in locations with strong long-term fundamentals may appreciate more reliably than off-the-plan speculative gains, generate rental income immediately without construction delays, and eliminate uncertainty about quality and specifications.
Staged Development Approach
If you're considering multiple off-the-plan purchases, stage them across different projects and timeframes rather than concentrating. This diversifies construction timing, developer risk, and market cycle exposure.
The Luminate Financial Group Perspective
At Luminate Financial Group, we counsel clients to approach off-the-plan investment with significant caution and thorough due diligence rather than being swept up in marketing hype or developer incentives.
Off-the-plan can work excellently in specific circumstances including purchasing early in market recoveries at conservative pricing, working with proven developers with strong track records, maintaining substantial financial buffers for adverse outcomes, limiting exposure to modest portfolio percentages, and having long-term investment horizons that can absorb short-term volatility.
However, off-the-plan investment has generated some of the worst outcomes we've observed including investors facing $50,000-$100,000+ negative equity at completion, properties completing worth less than similar existing properties that could have been purchased immediately, construction delays creating extended periods of negative cash flow, and properties with quality issues requiring expensive remediation.
The marketing promises of instant equity and capital gains during construction materialize sometimes but fail to materialize at least as frequently. When off-the-plan works, it works well. When it fails, consequences can be severe.
Our general recommendation is that off-the-plan should represent opportunistic additions to diversified portfolios for risk-tolerant investors with substantial financial buffers rather than core investment strategies for most investors. The risks warrant caution that many investors, swept up in glossy marketing and developer enthusiasm, fail to exercise adequately.
For most investors most of the time, existing properties offer better risk-adjusted returns with greater certainty, immediate rental income, and transparent quality assessment. Off-the-plan should be the exception requiring compelling justification rather than the default approach.
When you do consider off-the-plan investment, approach it with eyes wide open to risks, conduct thorough independent due diligence beyond developer marketing materials, ensure conservative pricing and developer quality, and maintain financial capacity to absorb adverse outcomes without catastrophic consequences.
Off-the-plan investment isn't inherently good or bad – it's a higher-risk, higher-uncertainty strategy that suits specific situations for specific investors but requires significantly more caution than marketing materials suggest. Understand both the compelling potential upsides and the sobering potential downsides thoroughly before committing your capital to properties that don't yet exist.
The shiny brochures and enthusiastic sales agents won't be there to help if your off-the-plan purchase completes worth $80,000 less than you paid while you're legally committed to settlement. Make decisions with this reality clearly in mind rather than optimistic scenarios that marketing materials emphasize exclusively.
Trent Bradley
Trent Bradley is a New Zealand financial advisor specializing in property-backed finance and investment consulting. With over 26 years of experience running his mortgage broking business, he has helped wholesale investors access high-yield property-backed loan opportunities. For the past 12 years, Trent has led Luminate Finance, a New Zealand finance company dedicated to connecting investors with secure property investment solutions.
















