Subscribe for Updates

Back to Blog
Legal Pitfalls to Avoid When Buying Investment Property in NZ
20:05

Legal Pitfalls to Avoid When Buying Investment Property in NZ

ezgif-4ef06527c2af7c

Property investment involves significant legal complexities that can create costly problems for unwary investors. From contract issues to title complications, building compliance matters to tenancy law requirements, numerous legal pitfalls await investors who don't conduct proper due diligence or seek appropriate professional advice.

At Luminate Financial Group, we've witnessed investors face substantial financial losses, legal disputes, and stress from legal issues that could have been avoided through proper precautions and professional guidance. A $5,000 legal problem discovered before purchase becomes a negotiating point or reason to walk away. The same problem discovered after settlement becomes your expensive problem to solve.

Understanding common legal pitfalls and how to avoid them protects your investment capital, prevents costly disputes, ensures compliance with regulations, and provides peace of mind throughout your property investment journey. Prevention through proper due diligence and professional advice costs far less than remediation after problems emerge.

Let's explore the most significant legal pitfalls facing New Zealand property investors and the steps to avoid them.

Important Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and doesn't constitute legal advice. Property law is complex and circumstances vary. Always engage qualified property lawyers before purchasing investment properties or entering binding commitments.

Pitfall 1: Inadequate or Waived Due Diligence Conditions

The most fundamental mistake investors make is signing unconditional sale and purchase agreements without proper due diligence, or waiving conditions prematurely to make offers more attractive to vendors.

The Problem

Standard sale and purchase agreements include conditions allowing you to conduct due diligence and withdraw if significant issues emerge. Common conditions include:

  • Building inspection satisfactory to purchaser
  • Finance approval
  • Land Information Memorandum (LIM) report satisfactory to purchaser
  • Title search satisfactory to purchaser
  • Review by lawyer

When investors sign unconditional agreements or waive these conditions without completing thorough investigations, they commit to purchases regardless of what problems subsequently emerge.

Real-World Consequences

Example 1: Investor waives building inspection condition to strengthen offer in competitive market. Post-settlement discovers $60,000 of weathertightness remediation required. No recourse.

Example 2: Investor signs unconditional offer on apartment. Post-settlement discovers building has outstanding building consent issues affecting salability and insurance. Stuck with problematic property.

How to Avoid This Pitfall

Never Go Unconditional Without Completing Due Diligence: Regardless of market competitiveness or vendor pressure, complete all due diligence before removing conditions or signing unconditional agreements.

Standard Due Diligence Checklist:

  • Comprehensive building inspection by qualified inspector
  • LIM report from council
  • Title search identifying easements, covenants, or encumbrances
  • Body corporate records review (for apartments/townhouses)
  • Tenancy agreement review if property is tenanted
  • Finance pre-approval from lender
  • Lawyer review of sale agreement and title

Allow Adequate Time: Request realistic timeframes for conditions – minimum 10-15 working days for standard due diligence. Rushed investigations miss problems.

Don't Waive Conditions for Trivial Benefits: Vendors sometimes request waiving conditions in exchange for minor price reductions. $5,000 discount doesn't justify waiving protections against $50,000+ problems.

Get Professional Advice: Engage experienced property lawyers who review agreements before you sign and guide you through due diligence processes.

Pitfall 2: Title Issues and Encumbrances

Property titles can contain restrictions, easements, covenants, or other encumbrances that affect how you can use properties, future development potential, or salability.

Common Title Problems

Easements: Rights allowing others to use parts of your property (access ways, drainage, utilities). Some easements significantly impact property use.

Restrictive Covenants: Rules limiting what you can do with property including building restrictions, color schemes, fence heights, or use limitations. Some covenants prevent subdivision or development.

Right of Ways: Shared access driveways or paths creating maintenance obligations, dispute risks, and potential access complications.

Unregistered Interests: Claims or interests not formally registered on title but potentially affecting property including adverse possession claims, prescriptive easements, or boundary disputes.

Real-World Consequences

Example: Investor purchases property planning future subdivision. Title covenant prohibits subdivision. Plans derailed, property worth less than anticipated.

Example: Investor purchases property with shared right of way. Neighbors refuse to contribute to driveway maintenance costs. Years of dispute and legal costs follow.

How to Avoid This Pitfall

Obtain Comprehensive Title Search: Have lawyers conduct thorough title searches identifying all easements, covenants, and encumbrances before purchase.

Read and Understand Title Documents: Don't just rely on summaries. Review actual covenant documents, easement plans, and title instruments to understand exact restrictions.

Assess Impact on Your Plans: Consider how title restrictions affect your intended use. If planning renovations, subdivisions, or development, verify title allows these activities.

Investigate Practical Implications: For shared rights of way or easements, inspect physical situations and speak with neighbors about how arrangements work in practice.

Factor Title Issues into Pricing: Properties with restrictive covenants, complicated easements, or shared access should be priced lower than unencumbered properties. Negotiate accordingly.

Walk Away if Necessary: If title issues prevent your intended use or create unacceptable risks, use due diligence conditions to withdraw from agreements.

Pitfall 3: Building and Planning Compliance Issues

Properties with building consent issues, unpermitted work, or planning compliance problems create significant risks including difficulties selling, insurance complications, potential council enforcement actions, and substantial remediation costs.

Common Compliance Problems

Unconsented Alterations: Previous owners undertaking work requiring consents without obtaining them including room additions, internal modifications, deck constructions, or plumbing/electrical work.

Outstanding Building Consents: Consented work that was never completed or signed off, leaving consents open on council records.

Non-Compliant Work: Work completed under consents but not meeting building code requirements or consent conditions.

Planning Breaches: Structures or uses breaching district plan rules including buildings too close to boundaries, height limit breaches, or use contraventions.

Weathertightness Issues: Properties built during leaky building era (1990s-2000s) potentially having weathertightness defects.

Real-World Consequences

Example: Investor purchases property with unpermitted deck addition. During sale attempt years later, purchaser's lawyer identifies issue. Must remove deck or retrospectively consent (expensive and uncertain). Sale falls through.

Example: Investor purchases apartment in building with outstanding weathertightness claims. Insurance becomes prohibitively expensive. Property value plummets.

How to Avoid This Pitfall

Commission Pre-Purchase Building Inspections: Engage qualified building inspectors to examine properties thoroughly, identifying potential compliance issues, unpermitted work, or building defects.

Review Council Records: LIM reports reveal building consents, outstanding consents, code compliance certificates, and known building issues. Review these carefully with lawyers.

Specific Checks for Leaky Building Era Properties: Properties built 1990-2004 warrant enhanced scrutiny. Consider specialist weathertightness inspections for properties from this era.

Verify Consent History: For properties with obvious alterations or improvements, verify building consents were obtained and completed properly through council records.

Assess Remediation Costs: If inspections identify issues, obtain quotes for remediation. Factor these costs into purchase price negotiations or use as grounds to withdraw.

Consider Insurance Implications: Some building issues affect insurability. Confirm properties can be insured at reasonable cost before proceeding.

Request Warranties: Consider requesting vendor warranties regarding building consent compliance in sale agreements. While limited protection, these can provide some recourse.

Pitfall 4: Misunderstanding Cross-Lease and Unit Title Properties

Cross-lease and unit title properties involve shared ownership elements that create complexities and potential problems compared to simple freehold titles.

Cross-Lease Complications

Cross-lease titles involve flat or unit ownership where you own your building but share underlying land ownership with other cross-lease owners.

Problems Include:

  • All owners must approve any alterations or improvements
  • Actual buildings must match plans registered on title
  • Variations between actual buildings and plans create title defects
  • Selling properties with variations can be complicated and expensive
  • Insurance can be more complex than freehold properties

Common Scenario: Previous owner added deck or altered building without updating cross-lease plans. Your property now has title defect requiring all cross-lease owners' cooperation to remedy – potentially expensive or impossible if owners don't cooperate.

Unit Title Complications

Unit title properties (apartments, some townhouses) involve body corporate structures with shared ownership and management.

Problems Include:

  • Binding body corporate rules affecting property use
  • Obligation to pay body corporate levies regardless of financial difficulties
  • Special levies for major work can reach tens of thousands
  • Body corporate disputes affecting living conditions
  • Poor body corporate governance creating management problems

How to Avoid These Pitfalls

For Cross-Lease Properties:

  • Have lawyers review cross-lease titles carefully
  • Verify buildings match registered plans (compare survey plans to actual structures)
  • If variations exist, assess remediation costs or negotiate significant price reductions
  • Understand you'll need other owners' approval for future changes
  • Consider whether cross-lease complications justify lower offer prices

For Unit Title Properties:

  • Review body corporate financial statements carefully
  • Check for upcoming major work requiring special levies
  • Review body corporate rules for restrictions affecting your intended use
  • Assess body corporate levy amounts and increases over time
  • Review body corporate meeting minutes for disputes or issues
  • Verify adequate reserve funds exist for future maintenance
  • Consider engaging specialists to review body corporate documents

General Advice: Freehold properties avoid these complications entirely. If similar freehold options exist, consider whether cross-lease or unit title complications are worth accepting.

Pitfall 5: Tenancy Law Non-Compliance

Investment properties come with legal obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act. Non-compliance creates liability, potential fines, and risks tenancy tribunal claims.

Common Tenancy Law Pitfalls

Healthy Homes Standards Non-Compliance: Properties must meet insulation, heating, ventilation, moisture, and drainage standards. Non-compliant properties face fines up to $7,200 and inability to legally rent.

Inadequate Tenancy Agreements: Using outdated, non-compliant, or inadequate tenancy agreements creates enforcement difficulties and potential liability.

Bond Non-Compliance: Bonds must be lodged with Tenancy Services within 23 working days. Failing to lodge creates liability and enforcement difficulties.

Maintenance Obligations: Landlords must maintain properties in reasonable condition. Failing to address maintenance requests timely can result in tribunal claims.

Privacy Breaches: Entering properties without proper notice or permission breaches tenants' rights, creating liability.

Unlawful Discrimination: Discriminating against tenants based on protected characteristics (race, religion, family status, etc.) is illegal and can result in Human Rights Commission proceedings.

How to Avoid These Pitfalls

Verify Healthy Homes Compliance Before Purchase: Check whether properties meet healthy homes standards or budget for required upgrades.

Use Professional Property Managers: Experienced property managers understand tenancy law and ensure compliance with regulations and processes.

Use Current Tenancy Agreement Templates: Tenancy Services provides free, compliant agreement templates. Use these or have lawyers prepare agreements.

Lodge Bonds Promptly: Create systems ensuring bonds are lodged within 23 working days of collection.

Respond to Maintenance Requests: Address tenant maintenance requests promptly and appropriately, documenting all communications.

Respect Tenant Privacy: Follow legal notice requirements before property inspections or entries.

Document Everything: Maintain comprehensive records of all tenancy interactions, agreements, notices, and maintenance.

Educate Yourself: Tenancy Services provides free resources explaining landlord obligations. Invest time understanding your legal requirements.

Pitfall 6: Failing to Engage Proper Professional Advice

Many legal pitfalls result from attempting to navigate complex property purchases without engaging qualified professionals or trying to minimize professional costs.

The False Economy

Some investors try to save money by avoiding lawyers, using cheapest possible legal services, conducting insufficient due diligence, or relying on non-expert advice.

Reality: The $2,000-$3,000 saved by skimping on professional advice often results in $20,000-$50,000+ problems that proper advice would have prevented.

How to Avoid This Pitfall

Engage Experienced Property Lawyers: Use lawyers specializing in property transactions, not general practitioners. Property law expertise matters for identifying issues.

Budget for Proper Due Diligence: Allocate $3,000-$5,000+ for professional fees, inspections, and reports. This is essential investment in risk mitigation, not optional expense.

Don't Rush Professional Advice: Give professionals adequate time to review documents, conduct searches, and provide thorough advice. Rushed reviews miss problems.

Follow Professional Recommendations: When lawyers or inspectors identify problems and recommend actions, follow their advice. They're identifying issues you hired them to find.

Maintain Ongoing Professional Relationships: Develop relationships with lawyers, accountants, and advisors who understand your investment strategy and can provide ongoing guidance beyond individual transactions.

Pitfall 7: Contractual Mistakes and Oversights

Sale and purchase agreements contain numerous terms affecting your rights, obligations, and remedies. Mistakes or oversights in contracts create problems.

Common Contract Pitfalls

Not Reading Contracts Thoroughly: Signing agreements without reading and understanding all terms.

Accepting Unfavorable Special Conditions: Vendors sometimes include special conditions favoring them. These require careful review and negotiation.

Inadequate Chattels Schedules: Failing to list chattels (appliances, blinds, etc.) you expect included in sales.

Settlement Date Problems: Agreeing to unrealistic settlement dates creating financing or logistics complications.

Deposit Structure Issues: Agreeing to non-standard deposit arrangements creating risk if agreements don't proceed.

How to Avoid These Pitfalls

Read Entire Agreements: Never sign contracts without reading every clause, special condition, and schedule.

Have Lawyers Review Before Signing: Engage lawyers before signing, not after. Once signed, you're bound regardless of problems lawyers subsequently identify.

Negotiate Unfavorable Terms: Don't accept unfavorable special conditions. Negotiate changes or include your own conditions protecting your interests.

Verify Chattels Lists: Walk through properties noting what you expect included. Ensure comprehensive chattels schedules list all items.

Realistic Settlement Dates: Allow adequate time for settlement considering financing approvals, due diligence, and logistics.

Standard Deposit Arrangements: Use standard deposits held by real estate agents or lawyers in trust unless exceptional circumstances warrant alternatives.

The Luminate Financial Group Perspective

At Luminate Financial Group, we emphasize that legal due diligence represents essential investment in risk mitigation, not optional expense. The $5,000-$8,000 spent on comprehensive due diligence, professional advice, and proper investigations prevents losses many multiples of that amount.

We've seen investors lose tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars through legal problems that proper due diligence would have identified. We've also seen investors walk away from problematic properties during due diligence periods, avoiding disasters that other less-diligent investors inherited.

The pattern is consistent: investors who engage qualified professionals, conduct thorough due diligence, and follow professional advice experience far fewer legal problems than those who cut corners or ignore professional guidance.

Property investment isn't the place to economize on professional advice. The amounts at stake – typically hundreds of thousands of dollars per property – warrant spending appropriately on proper professional guidance.

Develop relationships with property lawyers you trust and use them for every property purchase. The cost is small relative to transaction values and risks involved.

When professionals identify problems, take them seriously. Red flags discovered during due diligence are opportunities to renegotiate, require remediation, or walk away – not obstacles to overcome through wishful thinking.

Finally, remember that legal pitfalls don't discriminate between experienced and novice investors. Even seasoned investors can encounter new legal issues or make mistakes on individual transactions. Maintain vigilance, conduct proper due diligence on every purchase, and never become complacent about legal risks.

Property investment in New Zealand involves navigating complex legal frameworks. Avoid legal pitfalls through proper due diligence, comprehensive professional advice, thorough documentation review, and willingness to walk away from problematic properties. The thousands you spend on prevention save tens or hundreds of thousands in remediation costs for problems that should never have become yours in the first place.

Legal due diligence is not optional expense – it's essential investment in protecting your capital and ensuring your property investments deliver expected returns rather than expensive problems.